How do you know whether a PPIA or an OIC is better for a client who owes the IRS back taxes? What are the differences? Learn it all here!
1 min read
When a client comes to you with a tax debt they simply can’t afford to pay, you have two primary options to help them resolve their IRS problem: a Partial Payment Installment Agreement (PPIA) or an Offer in Compromise (OIC). The two methods of settling tax debts are very similar in several ways. Candidates for your services are often in similar situations, the IRS requires a similar set of information for both OIC and PPIA, and the taxpayer ends up paying less than their total tax debt if the offer or payment plan is approved.
So then why would you choose a PPIA over an OIC, or vice versa?
You have two primary options to help them resolve their IRS problem: a Partial Payment Installment Agreement or an Offer in Compromise.
The most notable downside of a PPIA is the lack of finality. When you agree to a PPIA, you’re also agreeing to allow the IRS to review the taxpayer’s financial situation every two years. That means that if the CSED is more than two years away and the taxpayer’s financial situation improves (such as an increase in income and/or equity), the IRS can demand an increased monthly payment and the sale (or borrowing against equity) of assets. In other words, the IRS is willing to agree to a small payment for now in hopes of getting a larger payout later.
When you agree to a PPIA, you’re also agreeing to allow the IRS to review the taxpayer’s financial situation every two years.
An OIC, on the other hand, is traditionally much more difficult to get approved but offers more closure. Once the agreement is finalized and the bill paid, the tax debt is settled, regardless of the amount of money the taxpayer makes after the fact.
Though the lack of finality in a PPIA is a con for taxpayers, the IRS sees that as a major benefit. The IRS will often prefer a PPIA over an OIC (especially if the CSED is still years away) in the hope that the taxpayer’s finances will improve, allowing the IRS to collect more on the outstanding tax debt. Because of this, the most appealing feature of a PPIA for tax pros is that it is traditionally easier to get approved by the IRS than an OIC.
The most appealing feature of a PPIA for tax pros is that it is traditionally easier to get approved by the IRS than an OIC.
Other benefits of a PPIA include a much faster decision from the IRS, no required lump-sum payment, and (often) lower monthly payments than in an OIC.
This article is a modified excerpt from our free ebook, An Introduction to Partial Payment Installment Agreements. Click below to download the entire thing, free!
Canopy takes the headaches out of client management by offering a way to keep client info organized.
I love how easy it is to setup a new client in this software. Once set up, it's one click to get IRS transcripts downloaded for my review. This saves me at least an hour each week in comparison to the software I used to use.
This makes workflow for tax resolution manageable. This business is a bunch of hurry up and wait. This system helps to refresh my memory while transitioning to different clients.
The ability to securely share documents with clients as well as complete POAs from client contact data already in Canopy. The ability to route workflow between team members with color coded statuses allows us to work efficiently.
Cool features, outstanding customer service, constantly updating to make it better. I love that I can upload files easily to a secure client portal and we don't have to email files anymore. Absolutely can't imagine not having this software.
It's safe and secure. Clients are able to upload documents and the documents are saved their portal which as a result, keeps us better organized. The task feature keeps us organized and we know exactly the status of each client.
Submit this form, and we will be in touch soon to give you a custom demo.
Set a time for one of our product specialists to give you a guided tour practice.